🔗 Share this article

European Union leaders have gathered in Brussels for end-of-year discussions facing a pivotal decision regarding the use of frozen Russian Federation funds to boost the Ukrainian defense against Russia.

“There is a simple option: either funds today, or blood in the future,” warned Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk. “This isn't just about Ukraine alone, this concerns Europe.”

The 27-nation bloc is working urgently to strengthen Kyiv’s hand while ex-American leader Donald Trump advocates for a rapid deal to halt the conflict as the invasion continues towards the fourth anniversary.

A Looming Fiscal Crisis and the Controversial Plan

The EU estimates Ukraine needs an additional €135bn ($159bn) to stay afloat during the 2026 and 2027, with the funding shortfall expected to begin in the spring. To fill this hole, the EU's executive arm has put forward a scheme to access some €210bn of Russian central bank reserves frozen within the bloc.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the proposal was critical to increase pressure on Vladimir Putin and send “a strong message to the Kremlin.”

A Split Bloc: Opposition and Juridical Concerns

However, a significant opposition bloc, spearheaded by Belgium—where the headquarters of Euroclear, which custodies most the Russian assets—is voicing questions about possible juridical challenges. Countries including Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Italy, Malta, and Slovakia have also registered reservations.

Technically, this coalition is not sufficient to block the plan should a vote be held under qualified majority procedures. Yet in practical political terms, it makes the process extremely difficult for all parties concerned.

But there is little indication of a middle ground, as the alternative option—focusing on EU joint borrowing—would need unanimous approval, and would almost certainly be blocked by Hungary, which categorically rejects providing any further assistance for Kyiv.

Leaders’ Comments Ahead of the Negotiations

EU officials have insisted that the summit discussions will continue as long as it is necessary to reach an consensus, warning that Ukraine’s survival and Europe’s credibility are on the line.

• Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, said she would not depart from the meeting before an deal is concluded.
• In a stark contrast, Slovakia's leader Robert Fico reportedly joked that they can keep him there until the new year, and he still wouldn’t back it.
• Ukraine's leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy is set to participate in the meeting in a last-ditch attempt to convince the skeptical nations.

Strong Opposition from Hungary

Hungary’s leader Viktor Orbán proved to be uncompromising, calling the proposition of utilizing frozen assets “stupid” and amounting to “marching into the war.” He voiced support for Belgium’s wary stance.

Appeals for Unity and a Solution

Other EU heads of state emphasized the urgency for a decision.

• António Costa, President of the European Council, pledged: “Negotiations will continue on the issue today, if it’s necessary tomorrow, but we will never leave the Council without a conclusive agreement.”
• Kaja Kallas, the EU’s top diplomat, noted that efforts to allay Belgian worries and distribute the risk equally were continuing. She put the odds of a deal at “fifty-fifty.”
• Micheál Martin, the Irish leader, stated his country was “strongly in favour” of using the immobilised assets.

The scene is prepared for a possibly long and strained negotiation in Brussels, with the future of substantial financial aid for Ukraine hanging in the balance.